You mean, get it while the ’sun’ is hot, before it becomes a red giant, destroys our atmosphere, sucks out our oceans. I think that is in 5.5 billion years. So there is enough time to get a good ROI.
Does subsidizing this really make sense in San Francisco: is there enough sun in outer Richmond district to generate enough power to meet the daily demand of an average household?
Hey Chris,
Here’s some info straight from Dave’s San Francisco Page:
“Fog is not the same thing as shade. Solar Power works in fog and when clouds are overhead. Depending on how foggy, rainy, or cloudy a day it is, it varies but on average it’s probably 25% effective. Remember, solar power is a YEARLY gig. You don’t pay until your “true-up” period at the end of the year. SF has sunny times and foggy times. It balances out. FACT: San Francisco gets more sun than Sacramento. (Yes, I’m serious)”
[...] are also going away too at step sizes of .30/Watt. Finally, if you’re waiting for the new San Francisco Credit, it’s retroactive anyway, it shouldn’t affect your decision or make you wait. I’m [...]
Please note, we will not approve your comment if it is spammy or you are blatantly trying to tout your own business. If you've got a reputable solar business and want to connect with us, please send us an email instead. We only connect our readers to trusted installers.